Your location:Home >Business >

Celis responded to the car fire in the mall: the preliminary judgment was that the source of the fire did not come from the vehicle itself

——

2022-06-16 10:14:41

Celis once again responded to the fire of its AITO brand car.

On the evening of June 15, in response to the fire in the Ordos Shopping Center in Inner Mongolia on the night of June 13, Celis responded that the charging stop time of the vehicles in the store was later than the time of the fire, and it could be preliminarily determined that the fire source did not come from the vehicle itself.

According to the police report from the Dongsheng Branch of the Ordos City Public Security Bureau in Inner Mongolia on June 14, at 23:00 on June 13, a fire broke out in the Ordos Shopping Center in Dongsheng District.After the fire was basically under control, firefighters entered the shopping mall to carry out an internal attack. When the residual fire was extinguished, two people were found successively. After being sent to the hospital, the rescue was unsuccessful. The cause of death was initially judged to be carbon monoxide poisoning and suffocation.

According to the online video, the vehicle on fire is the AITO M5 under Celis, which was jointly launched by Huawei and Celis. The product is sold in Huawei's offline stores and has the title of "the first Huawei Hongmeng car".

Sailis said that it is understood that according to the requirements of the National Testing and Management Center for New Energy Vehicles, AITO Automobile has built a remote data monitoring and management system, which will report the basic data of the vehicle to the cloud as soon as possible.Celis analyzed the background data of the on-site vehicle at the first time, and could initially confirm that the source of the fire did not come from the vehicle.

The internal investigation information of Celis shows: At 22:50 on June 13, the Ordos Fire Rescue Detachment received a fire alarm in the shopping mall, and the vehicle was in a normal charging state until the end of charging at 22:55:48, and the charging current and temperature were not seen. abnormal.Since the charging stop time is later than the fire time, it can be preliminarily determined that the fire source does not come from the vehicle itself.

However, Celis also said that the company is also waiting for the final findings of the fire department and other relevant departments.

【Editor: Ge Cheng】

Hotspot ranking