The latest position and scale data of E Fund, GF, Guohai Franklin and other fund companies have been exposed.
Recently, fund product announcements, listed company announcements, etc. have successively disclosed the scale changes and positions of fund institutions, which have become a "window" for investors to observe the mid-year layout of fund institutions.
scale ups and downs
Recently, both E Fund Fund and GF Fund have announced that some funds have been allocated with Huguang’s non-public offering of A shares. Six funds including E Fund New Normal Flexible Allocation and E Fund Information Industry Mix have been allocated, GF Multi-factor Flexible Allocation, GF Value Pilot one-year holding period mixed and other 5 funds were allocated.
According to the allocation data, as of July 7, the net asset value of E Fund’s new normal flexible allocation fund was about 2.552 billion yuan, the net asset value of E Fund’s new Silk Road flexible allocation hybrid fund was about 4.418 billion yuan, and the net asset value of E Fund’s information industry hybrid fund was about 34.81 yuan. The net asset value of E Fund’s supply reform and flexible allocation fund is about 6.381 billion yuan, the net asset value of E Fund Information Industry Selected Fund is about 2.552 billion yuan, and the net asset value of E Fund Global Growth Selected Mixed Fund is about 399 million yuan.
From April 1st to July 7th, the net value growth rates of the above-mentioned funds under E Fund Fund were 11.53%, 17.56%, 9.14%, 17.80%, 6.69% and 6.26% respectively (E Fund Global Growth Selected Mixed Net Value Growth Rate is Class A. net share growth).
Comparing the fund size data at the end of the first quarter, it is found that, except for the increase in the net asset value of the E Fund New Normal Flexible Allocation and E Fund New Silk Road Flexible Allocation Mixed Funds, the net asset value of other products decreased, while the E Fund New Normal Flexible Allocation and E Fund New Silk Road Flexible Allocation Mixed Net Assets increased. Not as high as the growth rate of the fund's net value.
As of July 7, the net asset value of GF Anhong’s return flexible allocation fund was about 1.987 billion yuan, the net asset value of GF’s multi-factor flexible allocation fund was about 17.949 billion yuan, and the net asset value of GF Value Pilot’s one-year holding period hybrid fund was about 286 million yuan. Yuan, GF Ruiyu’s one-year holding period mixed fund has a net asset value of about 4.255 billion yuan, and GF Strategic Preferred Mixed Fund has a net asset value of about 4.487 billion yuan.At the end of the first quarter, the net asset value of GF Anhong’s return flexible allocation fund was about 50.4049 million yuan, the net asset value of GF’s multi-factor flexible allocation fund was about 20.903 billion yuan, and the net asset value of GF Ruiyu’s one-year holding period hybrid fund was about 3.861 billion yuan. The net asset value of the GF Strategic Preferred Mixed Fund is about 4.017 billion yuan.
Position in and out
Recently, a number of listed companies have disclosed the latest shareholder information, revealing the latest position adjustment of fund institutions.
The announcement disclosed by Miao Ke Lan Duo recently showed that as of June 30, Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited, Wufeng Countercurrent Private Equity Investment Fund, Huijiu No. 3 Private Securities Investment Fund, UBS AG, Rongyue Baina Innovation Driven Private Equity Securities The investment fund holds 10.7287 million shares, 7.2993 million shares, 6.9731 million shares, 6.4729 million shares and 5.8321 million shares of the company in circulation.Comparing the list of shareholders at the end of the first quarter, it is found that Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited increased its holdings of the company's shares in the second quarter, and Huijiu No. 3 Private Securities Investment Fund, UBS AG, and Rongyue Baina Innovation-Driven Private Securities Investment Fund all reduced their holdings of the company's shares.
Espressif announced that, as of June 29, Franklin Guohai small and medium-cap stock securities investment fund, Cathay Pacific CES semiconductor chip industry exchange-traded open-ended index securities investment fund, UBS AG and Franklin Guohai elastic market capitalization hybrid securities investment fund They hold 1,542,800 shares, 966,300 shares, 908,400 shares and 694,400 shares of the company respectively.At the end of the first quarter, the number of Franklin Guohai small and medium-cap stock securities investment funds was 1,791,500 shares, the Cathay Pacific CES semiconductor chip industry exchange-traded open-ended index securities investment fund held 886,700 shares, and Franklin Guohai flexible market value hybrid securities Investment funds hold 1.2519 million shares.In addition, at the end of the first quarter, Franklin Guohai Hengrui Bond Securities Investment Fund held 915,500 tradable shares, while UBS AG was not among the top ten tradable shareholders at that time.
The announcement of the listed company also showed that, as of June 27, the Longitudinal Steady No. 1 Private Securities Investment Fund and the Danguishunzhi Wuyuefang Private Fund held 596,600 shares and 273,300 tradable shares of Midea respectively.Comparing the data at the end of the first quarter, it is found that the shareholdings of the Longitudinal Robust No. 1 Private Securities Investment Fund have not changed.
Organization: Balanced Configuration
Golden Eagle Fund said that in the context of economic recovery, the market's subsequent rebound space depends on fundamental verification and incremental policy space.Listed companies enter the mid-year report performance disclosure window, and A-shares may be more sensitive to the expected difference on the profit side.It is recommended to focus on the main line of recovery, but the valuation ceiling should not be too high, and the room for improvement in valuation will come from changes in corporate profits.
In terms of industry allocation, Golden Eagle Fund stated that it maintains a balanced allocation of "consumption + underestimated technology + steady growth".Short-term adjustments can be made to realize high-valued industry returns, and turn to relatively low-valued medium-term “recovery” mainline varieties, including consumption and growth segments supported by demand. The mainline of stable growth focuses on real estate and the post-cycle chain, and the mainline after the epidemic The repair space is also expected to be further improved.In addition, we will continue to pay attention to strong varieties such as optional consumption and automobiles that will benefit from economic recovery in the future.The allocation of the technology sector needs to be based on the premise of both valuation and cost-effectiveness, and the layout of the high prosperity. Focus on the sub-categories in the technology track that benefit from the recovery of downstream consumer demand, you can focus on the relatively high performance in the interim report, and the valuation is still relatively high and attractive. Powerful new energy, military and other sectors of high-quality varieties.
GF Fund said that in an environment where economic recovery is weak, industry allocation should give priority to prosperity.On the one hand, the high-end manufacturing industry, which has an upward industrial trend, benefits from falling costs, and on the other hand, demand benefits from the policy of stabilizing growth. It is expected that the prosperity will have a relative advantage.It is recommended to pay attention to industries with good industrial trends and strong export resilience, such as photovoltaics, wind power, electric vehicles, automobiles and parts and other high-end manufacturing directions.
